The RMN NGPV are of "modular" Meko 100 design
which is a smaller version of the Meko 200. There are five main modules which
can be built by five separate shipyards and later assembled together viz the
forward section, the midship section, the aft section, the forward gun module
and the CIC module. I have no knowledge of the LCS design. If it were of
modular concept, then the construction works can be distributed to, say, NGV
Tech - forward section, MSET - forward gun module, BNS - midship section, HLL -
aft section, Grade One - CIC section. Other Class B shipyards can can also participate,
i.e UniKL Mimet to build the funnel assembly, Destiny - hangar section, etc.
etc. If I were a corrupt minister/ RMN/ BNS trying to collude with, say, MSET, there would
be four other shipyards in the consortium to apprehend and blow the whistles.
It's not easy for me to corrupt all five shipyards. This seems like a
hypothetical assumption but worth trying
Malaysia should have learned from Australia when the latter
built Anzac Meko 200 warships by distributing the works to a consortium of
shipyards, not a monopoly by a single shipyard. This combined effort approach
would provide broader, hence, stronger and more resilient project management.
The LCS is of tonnage that must be built by Class A shipyards. In Malaysia
there several such shipyards
The yards involve will
proof their best works & result. Then we will know, if it happen
when one yard fail, other yards progressively advance. If any shipyard face
challenges , quickly the main contractor can investigate. Then we have check & balance.
Well, just like other nations spread the project amongst their yards, US UK AUSSIE practice this.
No comments:
Post a Comment